Unit 07 · Chapter 4 · 12 min read

Purchase agreements, options, leases, and notes

Identify what each instrument promises and which rights it creates.

Instrument
A purchase contract, lease, note, and security instrument perform different jobs.
Choice
An option gives a defined exercise right, not an immediate duty to purchase.
Negotiability
Contract enforceability, negotiability, collateral, and securities regulation are separate tests.

Learning objectives

  • Read a purchase contract as a coordinated set of promises and conditions.
  • Distinguish purchase options, rights of first refusal, leases, and land sale contracts.
  • Separate a promissory note from its security and recognize personal-property security instruments.

Read the whole transaction

Reconcile price, deposit, financing, costs, and credits without counting the same funds twice; the purchase agreement governs more than the headline price.

A purchase contract coordinates price, financing, deposits, title, investigation, disclosures, closing, possession, and remedies. A familiar printed form is still a contract whose completed blanks, checked boxes, attachments, and amendments matter. Two agreements using the same form can produce different results.

Start with parties and property. Confirm who owns the interest being sold and who has authority to sign. The description must identify the intended property adequately. Address personal property separately when necessary: a deed conveying a home does not automatically transfer every movable item the buyer saw during a showing.

Then reconcile the money. Purchase price should equal the agreed components, such as deposit, additional cash, and financing. The buyer's closing costs are separate from the purchase price unless expressly included in a calculation. A seller credit affects the closing allocation but does not necessarily reduce the stated price or the amount used for every other computation.

Reconcile the purchase funds

A contract states a $640,000 price, a $16,000 initial deposit, a $496,000 new loan, and the remainder in cash. The additional price funds are $128,000: subtract the deposit and loan from the price. If the buyer also owes $12,000 in closing costs and receives a permitted $5,000 credit toward those costs, the simplified additional cash requirement is $135,000, assuming no other charges or credits.

The deposit is part of the buyer's price contribution, not an amount added on top of the full price a second time. Loan proceeds and a seller cost credit also serve different functions. The loan is financing that generally becomes a secured repayment obligation; the credit allocates a specified expense. Neither automatically changes the property's legal description or the seller's gross contract price.

The figures should agree across the purchase agreement, amendments, loan documents, and escrow instructions. If a later amendment raises the price but leaves the loan fixed, more cash may be required. A signed price increase does not force the lender to increase its commitment. Identifying the changed funding gap before closing is part of understanding the contract's practical effect.

A price amendment need not increase the loan
Amended price: original $640,000 plus $20,000
$660,000
Unchanged new-loan proceeds
-$496,000
Deposit already paid
-$16,000
Buyer closing costs
$12,000
Permitted seller credit toward costs
-$5,000
Additional cash due$155,000

The original calculation was $135,000. With everything else fixed, the $20,000 price increase raises additional cash by the same $20,000.

Stipulated amendment and lender commitment; no other charges, impounds, or prorations. The paid deposit is credited once, and the seller cost credit does not reduce the stated $660,000 price. Chapter sources

Financing, title, and possession

Identify financing conditions, promised title, and possession arrangements separately; an early move-in or seller carryback can create obligations beyond closing arithmetic.

A financing provision should identify the expected loan and the parties' obligations if the loan cannot be obtained. Seller financing introduces a note and security documentation rather than merely adding the words "seller will carry." Principal, interest, payments, maturity, security, priority, and applicable disclosures affect the bargain.

Title provisions describe the interest and condition of title to be delivered. An existing easement may be an accepted exception, while an undisclosed judgment lien may need removal. The purchase contract, preliminary title information, and escrow instructions should be consistent about what must happen before closing.

Closing and possession are distinct. A buyer can acquire title before receiving possession under an agreed seller occupancy arrangement. Early possession before closing raises different risks because the expected transfer has not yet occurred. Clearly document rent, deposits, insurance, responsibility for damage, and the consequences if the sale fails; do not treat moving in as a harmless informal favor.

Default casualty rule: title OR possession matters. Unless the contract expressly provides otherwise, Civil Code section 1662 separates two stages:

Stage when destruction or a taking occursStatutory consequence under the stated fault condition
Neither legal title nor possession has transferred; all or a material part is destroyed without the buyer's fault, or taken by eminent domainThe seller cannot enforce the purchase contract, and the buyer may recover the price already paid.
Either legal title or possession has transferred; all or any part is destroyed without the seller's fault, or taken by eminent domainThat event does not relieve the buyer of paying the price or entitle the buyer to recover payments.

Early possession can therefore change the default result even before the deed transfers. Read an express risk-allocation clause before applying this statutory default. Section 1662.

An addendum adds terms; an amendment changes an existing agreement. The word used on the page is less important than timing and substance, but the parties should know whether a document is part of the original offer or a later modification requiring assent. Conflicting language should be resolved before performance, with legal assistance when interpretation is uncertain.

Early possession can change the casualty-risk result

Assume the purchase contract does not expressly change section 1662, an accidental fire materially destroys the property, neither party is at fault, and no other issue affects the result. The fire cases below are alternatives.

  1. Before either transfer
    Alternative A: fire before title or possession

    Neither legal title nor possession has passed. The seller cannot enforce the contract under section 1662(a), and the buyer can recover price payments.

  2. Early occupancy
    Buyer receives possession

    In the alternative sequence, the buyer takes possession before the deed transfer. This is a legally consequential event, not just a scheduling convenience.

  3. After possession; before title
    Alternative B: fire after early occupancy

    Possession has passed even though title has not. Under section 1662(b), that casualty alone does not relieve the buyer of paying or entitle recovery of price already paid.

The statutory switch is title OR possession, subject to its conditions and an express contrary agreement. Moving in early can change the analysis before closing.

This is a default-rule comparison, not an insurance coverage determination. Fault, nonmaterial damage before transfer, and negotiated risk clauses can change the problem. Chapter sources

Options and first-refusal rights

Exercise an option according to its terms, and distinguish that current choice from a first-refusal right triggered by a future proposed sale.

A purchase option gives the optionee a right to purchase on stated terms within a specified period. The optionor is bound to honor a valid exercise, while the optionee generally is free to let the option expire. Consideration supports the option commitment, and applicable writing rules must be satisfied.

The option price and option consideration are different. A buyer might pay $4,000 for a ninety-day right to purchase at $500,000. Whether the $4,000 is credited toward the purchase price depends on the contract. It is not automatically a refundable earnest-money deposit or an addition to the sale price.

Exercise must follow the specified method, deadline, and other conditions. A notice sent late or proposing a different price may fail to exercise the option. Once properly exercised, the resulting purchase obligations are analyzed according to the option and applicable law.

A right of first refusal ordinarily gives its holder an opportunity when the owner decides to sell or receives a qualifying offer under the agreement. It does not necessarily allow the holder to demand a sale immediately at a previously fixed price. A right of first offer may require the owner to approach the holder before marketing. The exact trigger and response procedure control.

Exercise means following the option terms

An option allows purchase for $520,000 if written exercise is received by the owner before 5 p.m. on a specified date. The holder sends a notice offering $510,000 and asking for an extra inspection condition. That communication proposes different terms; it is not necessarily an effective exercise of the existing option. The owner can consider the proposal without being required to treat it as acceptance of the original option.

An exercise notice should also be distinguished from the later purchase performance. Some options require payment when exercised; others create a subsequent closing obligation. Read whether notice, payment, or both constitute exercise. A holder who sends timely notice but omits an expressly required payment may not have satisfied the condition.

Lease-option arrangements need similarly careful separation. Rent secures possession, option consideration secures a choice, and a purchase deposit serves the resulting sale under its terms. A tenant can lose the option through an unmet contractual condition without necessarily losing every tenancy right immediately. Conversely, a tenant's continued possession does not necessarily extend an expired option. The interaction follows the agreements and applicable protective law.

Timely notice may satisfy only half the exercise clause
Fictional educational excerpt / Not for execution

Purchase option / Exercise conditions

Original educational excerpt, not for execution. Assume a valid supported option, clear conditions, and no waiver or other exception.

  1. Underlying bargain$525,000 purchase price

    The holder may exercise this bargain, not unilaterally substitute a lower price or new contingency.

  2. Required noticeUnconditional written exercise received by 4 p.m. on August 20

    The contract requires receipt, not merely sending the notice before the deadline.

  3. Required exercise payment$5,000 received with exercise by that deadline

    This payment is an express exercise condition, not merely an amount due at a later closing.

  4. Actual performanceNotice received at 3 p.m.; payment first tendered the next day

    Timely notice alone does not satisfy both of the stipulated exercise conditions.

Read what constitutes exercise separately from what happens after exercise. A different option requiring notice alone would create a different case.

No universal payment deadline is asserted. This illustration tests the clear terms actually given, not every equitable issue in an option dispute. Chapter sources
A power to buy is not the same as first refusal
Option
  • The holder can elect to purchase on agreed terms within the option period.
  • Exercise must comply with the option; the holder is not initially required to buy.
Right of first refusal
  • A specified event triggers an opportunity to purchase under the agreement.
  • The holder cannot necessarily force the owner to offer a sale now.
A lease-option combines separate possession and purchase rights. Paying rent alone does not necessarily exercise the option or create purchase equity. Chapter sources
A first-refusal right starts with the agreed trigger

A valid fictional right applies when the owner decides to accept a bona fide third-party purchase offer; it requires notice of those terms and allows five calendar days after receipt to match. What follows?

Owner declines every offer
The holder wants to force a sale today for $400,000, but the agreement sets no such fixed-price purchase power.The stated first-refusal trigger has not occurred. Do not turn it into an option the owner never granted.
Owner decides to accept $450,000 cash
The notice communicates the qualifying offer and the agreed response period begins on receipt.The holder must follow the matching procedure and applicable terms, not rely on an old informal price discussion.
Holder requests $440,000 and financing
The response changes both price and financing instead of matching the noticed cash offer.The proposed new bargain is not a match under the stipulated right merely because it arrives within five days.
The five-day period and trigger are invented contractual terms, not California-wide defaults. Package sales, transfers to affiliates, gifts, and altered third-party terms require reading the actual agreement and law. Chapter sources

A lease transfers possession, not the fee

A lease transfers possessory rights for a period; retaining part of the remaining term distinguishes a sublease from a complete leasehold assignment.

A lease grants a leasehold right to possess and use property for the agreed term in exchange for rent or other consideration. The lessor grants possession; the lessee receives it. The lessor retains the reversion, meaning the right to possession when the leasehold properly ends.

An estate for years has a fixed term, even if it lasts only six months. A periodic tenancy continues through recurring periods until properly terminated. Tenancy at will and tenancy at sufferance describe different possession situations and should not be used as synonyms for every month-to-month tenancy.

A gross lease generally places specified operating expenses on the landlord; a net lease shifts specified expenses to the tenant. A percentage lease ties some rent to business receipts, often with a minimum base rent. A ground lease concerns land and may contemplate tenant improvements. These labels do not replace reading which taxes, insurance, maintenance, and repairs each party actually promised to pay.

Lease covenants can address permitted use, assignment, subletting, alterations, maintenance, insurance, and defaults. Residential statutory protections can override inconsistent lease language. A lease option combines possession under a lease with a separate purchase choice; it does not automatically make every rental payment equity in the property.

Assignment and sublease allocate different rights

In a typical lease assignment, the tenant transfers the remaining leasehold interest to another person. In a sublease, the tenant retains a reversionary interest, such as the final portion of the term, while granting a lesser interest to the subtenant. The original tenant becomes a sublessor in that arrangement. Labels can be misleading if the transferred interest says otherwise.

Suppose a tenant holds a five-year lease with three years remaining and grants another occupant possession for two years, retaining the final year. That is ordinarily a sublease because the tenant retains an interest after the subtenant's term ends. Transferring the entire remaining three-year term more closely resembles an assignment. Consent requirements and permitted use must still be checked.

Neither transaction automatically releases the original tenant from contractual liability to the landlord. A release or novation requires a separate basis. If the replacement occupant stops paying, the original tenant may remain responsible under the lease even after moving out. This illustrates the distinction between transferring possession, transferring contractual rights, and obtaining release from promised performance.

The retained final year identifies the lesser interest

A tenant has all of 2027-2029 remaining on a valid commercial lease. Required consent is obtained; no release, extension, or holdover occurs.

  1. January 1, 2027
    Subtenant takes the entire premises

    The original tenant grants possession only through December 31, 2028 and retains the last year of the head lease.

  2. December 31, 2028
    The granted term ends

    The subtenant's stated two-year interest ends, while the original tenant still has a year of leasehold rights.

  3. During 2029
    Original tenant retains the final year

    That retained reversionary interval explains why this is a sublease rather than an assignment of the entire remaining term.

  4. December 31, 2029
    Head lease reaches its stated end

    The original tenant's contractual responsibility was not erased merely by granting the sublease.

Change the grant to the entire remaining 2027-2029 term and the classification moves toward assignment, but release from promised rent still requires a separate basis.

Classification follows the interest transferred, not the document's heading. Residential protective statutes and any actual renewal or default would require separate treatment. Chapter sources
Follow the interest the original tenant retains
Assignment
  • Transfers the remaining leasehold interest in the typical case.
  • Example: all three remaining years pass to the replacement occupant.
Sublease
  • Transfers a lesser interest while the original tenant retains a reversionary interest.
  • Example: two of three remaining years pass, with the final year retained.
Check consent requirements and the actual interest transferred. Neither structure automatically releases the original tenant from the lease obligations owed to the landlord. Chapter sources

Notes and their security

A note evidences repayment while separate security supports collection; negotiability and possible securities treatment do not disappear because collateral is real estate.

A promissory note evidences a promise to pay. It identifies the maker, payee, principal, interest, payment schedule, and maturity as applicable. A note can exist without real estate security. A mortgage or deed of trust provides security for the obligation by encumbering real property. The debt instrument and the security instrument serve different purposes.

Conflicting terms: Read the note and its security together. Under the general rule described in DRE's finance reference, the note's terms usually control an actual conflict. Suppose the note states 6% interest but its deed of trust states 7%, with no superseding amendment, special priority clause, or other controlling rule. The ordinary answer is 6%, not the higher rate merely because the security instrument was recorded. A term appearing in only one instrument is not necessarily a conflict; do not disregard the security document's other applicable provisions.

A note meeting the Uniform Commercial Code's requirements may be negotiable. Among other requirements, it must involve an unconditional promise or order to pay a fixed amount of money, be payable to order or bearer when required, and be payable on demand or at a definite time, without disallowed additional undertakings. Not every document titled "note" qualifies.

A variable interest rate does not by itself defeat negotiability. Commercial Code section 3112 permits fixed or variable interest amounts or rates, including descriptions referencing outside information. Distinguish uncertainty in the interest calculation from a promise that payment itself occurs only if a project succeeds. The latter raises a different, conditional-payment issue.

An assignment can transfer a note and its related interests, subject to the relevant rules. The lender's beneficial interest in a deed of trust is not transferred to the borrower by a deed of reconveyance; reconveyance is associated with releasing the security after the secured obligation is satisfied. Keep debt transfer and lien release distinct.

For personal property, a security agreement and the Uniform Commercial Code often govern collateral. The older term chattel mortgage refers to personal-property security. A financing statement generally gives public notice of a claimed security interest; it is not the same instrument as a bill of sale, which transfers ownership of personal property.

Promises, negotiability, and investment risk

A note promising repayment of $100,000 in one year with specified interest presents a different issue from a writing promising payment only if a speculative project succeeds. The condition may prevent the second writing from meeting the unconditional-promise requirement for negotiability. Lack of negotiability does not necessarily mean no contract exists; it changes the legal treatment and defenses applicable to transfer and enforcement.

Security likewise should not be mistaken for certainty of repayment. A $100,000 note secured by a junior deed of trust on a property already burdened by $500,000 of senior debt may face substantial loss if the property brings only $520,000 after expenses. The written promise, the collateral value, and priority each affect risk. A recorded instrument does not guarantee enough sale proceeds for every creditor.

Some transactions involving notes or pooled interests can also implicate securities laws. A real estate license is not blanket authorization to market every investment product, and calling an investment "secured by property" does not resolve registration, exemption, or disclosure questions. The salesperson should recognize the boundary and obtain appropriate licensed and legal assistance instead of inferring permission from the presence of real estate collateral.

A bill of sale has another function: it transfers identified personal property. In a business sale, equipment might transfer by bill of sale while the buyer's promise to pay is evidenced by a note and secured through the applicable security agreement. Using separate instruments makes the legal effects clear: ownership transfer, debt obligation, and collateral rights are coordinated but distinct.

A payment condition differs from a limited payment source
Express condition
  • The maker owes payment only if a specified project obtains approval.
  • The promise expressly conditions payment on an outside event.
  • That raises an unconditional-promise defect; a contract may still exist even if the writing is not negotiable.
Limited source
  • The promise is payable from an identified fund only, with no other express condition.
  • Section 3106(b)(2) says a particular-fund or source limitation does not itself make the promise conditional.
  • Check all other negotiability requirements; do not infer a repayment guarantee from this narrow rule.
Collateral reference
  • The note refers to a deed of trust for collateral, prepayment, or acceleration rights.
  • Section 3106(b)(1) permits those references without making the promise conditional for that reason.
  • This differs from saying all payment rights are subject to a separate agreement.
Read the operative words, not only whether an outside document or project is mentioned. Source limitation and event-conditioned liability require different analysis. Chapter sources
Fixed principal and variable interest can coexist
Fictional educational excerpt / Not for execution

Promissory note / Selected teaching terms

Original educational excerpt, not for execution. Assume a signed unconditional promise and all other negotiability requirements; no prohibited additional undertaking is included.

  1. Principal and payee$100,000 payable to the order of Example Lender

    Identify the fixed money principal and the designated recipient; this is not a deed conveying the property.

  2. MaturityDecember 1, 2027

    The stipulated date makes payment timing definite rather than dependent on an unspecified successful project.

  3. Interest descriptionPublished index plus the stated margin, reset as specified

    Section 3112 permits variable rates and references to outside information; variability alone is not a negotiability defect.

  4. Collateral referenceSee the identified deed of trust for collateral rights

    A permitted reference concerning security is distinct from making the payment promise subject to another agreement.

Test each requirement. Neither a variable rate nor a permitted security reference automatically makes this otherwise qualifying promise nonnegotiable.

Negotiability is not a credit rating, guarantee of payment, or proof that selling an investment is exempt from securities law. Chapter sources

Land sale contracts and a worked scenario

Under a land sale contract, installment performance and retained legal title require careful analysis; an option credit alone does not establish the same ownership arrangement.

Under an installment land sale contract, the buyer makes agreed payments while the seller retains legal title until specified performance. The buyer generally receives an equitable interest. This differs from a completed conveyance financed by a seller-held note and deed of trust. Remedies, forfeiture limitations, recording, and existing financing require careful analysis.

For the particular statutory category in Civil Code section 2985, the agreement does not require title conveyance within one year from formation. The section also excludes its specified attached-condominium contracts under a conditional public report. Do not classify an ordinary purchase closing in thirty days as this statutory arrangement simply because the buyer makes an initial deposit and a later payment. Section 2985.

Tenant Rowan pays $2,000 monthly rent and $5,000 for a purchase option. The agreement expressly credits $300 of each timely rent payment and the option fee at closing. After ten qualifying payments, the potential contractual credit is $8,000: $3,000 plus $5,000. Rowan does not own the fee merely because payments were made. Proper option exercise and the required transfer still matter.

Rent paid and potential purchase credit do not grow together
Cumulative amount
Rent paid and potential purchase credit do not grow together: Cumulative amount by Completed rental monthAfter six months the tenant has paid $12,000 rent plus $3,000 option consideration. The potential credit is only $3,000 + five qualifying $400 credits = $5,000, contingent on proper exercise and closing. Exact coordinates are provided in the Values table.$0$6K$12K036
Completed rental month
  • Rent actually paid
  • Potential closing credit

After six months the tenant has paid $12,000 rent plus $3,000 option consideration. The potential credit is only $3,000 + five qualifying $400 credits = $5,000, contingent on proper exercise and closing.

Values
Rent paid and potential purchase credit do not grow together: plotted values
SeriesCompleted rental monthCumulative amount
Rent actually paid0$0.00
Rent actually paid1$2,000.00
Rent actually paid2$4,000.00
Rent actually paid3$6,000.00
Rent actually paid4$8,000.00
Rent actually paid5$10,000.00
Rent actually paid6$12,000.00
Potential closing credit0$3,000.00
Potential closing credit1$3,400.00
Potential closing credit2$3,800.00
Potential closing credit3$4,200.00
Potential closing credit4$4,200.00
Potential closing credit5$4,600.00
Potential closing credit6$5,000.00
Fictional terms: $2,000 monthly rent; $400 credit only for timely payments; month 4 is paid late and earns no credit, without otherwise ending the option. The $3,000 option fee is separately paid and credited at closing. Lines connect month-end observations, not daily accrual or present ownership equity. Chapter sources
The same seller-financed balance can use different title arrangements
Installment land sale contract
  • Price is $400,000; buyer pays $100,000 and owes $300,000 under the stipulated five-year installment terms.
  • Seller retains legal title until the agreed five-year payment obligation is completed; buyer generally acquires an equitable interest.
  • Do not infer an automatic forfeiture of all payments after default; remedies and protective rules require separate analysis.
Deed delivered; seller takes security
  • The same $100,000 cash and $300,000 financing fund a completed conveyance to the buyer.
  • The $300,000 note states the debt; a deed of trust secures it for the seller as beneficiary.
  • The seller is a secured creditor, not an owner simply retaining the entire fee until every payment is made.
Assume valid instruments and no other liens or financing. Equal payment arithmetic does not establish equal title interests, remedies, or recording consequences. Chapter sources

Exam review

Classify the instrument before applying rules about money, title, possession, or exercise; similar payment language can support very different legal rights.

Ask what the document does: employment, promise to buy, right to choose, possession, debt, security, or conveyance. A lease is not a deed, a note is not its security, and an option is not an obligation to purchase before exercise. Read amounts and deadlines according to the agreement rather than their everyday labels.

Make the call

A secured promise with a profits condition

A developer offers an investor a written promise to repay $100,000 only if the development generates sufficient profits. The promise is accompanied by a deed of trust. The promoter calls it a guaranteed negotiable note and says a real estate license removes any need to consider securities laws. Assume the payment condition is genuine and no separate unconditional promise exists.

Which evaluation correctly separates the document's different legal functions?

Test repayment, negotiability, security, and regulation separately

The profits condition matters to negotiability; the deed of trust and possible securities treatment require independent analysis.

A conditional repayment obligation should not be presented as an unconditional negotiable promise merely because it is written or secured. The document may still create contractual rights even if it fails negotiable-instrument requirements. Collateral presents additional priority and value questions, not a guaranteed recovery. The SEC cautions that promissory notes can be securities, so appropriate registration, exemption, and licensing questions cannot be dismissed by pointing to a real estate license.

Treat recording as the cure

Recording the deed of trust does not remove the condition from the underlying repayment promise.

The security instrument concerns an interest supporting an obligation and its treatment in the property records. It does not rewrite the note, prove project profitability, or eliminate senior liens. Recording and negotiability therefore answer different questions. A recorded instrument can secure a risky obligation, and the existence of collateral does not establish compliance with a separate securities requirement.

Treat nonnegotiability as absence of every obligation

Failure of a negotiability requirement does not automatically make the entire contractual arrangement void.

Negotiability is a specialized classification with specific requirements. Ordinary contract enforceability asks other questions about assent, consideration, lawful purpose, capacity, and terms. A condition may prevent negotiability while leaving an enforceable conditional promise. Whether this particular agreement or offering is enforceable still requires full analysis; the classification alone cannot resolve every other defect or regulatory issue.

TakeawayA variable interest rate is different from a condition on repayment. Commercial Code section 3112 permits variable interest, so that feature alone does not defeat negotiability. Read the actual promise, identify security and priority, and examine any separate securities requirements rather than relying on the package's name.

Chapter sources

Exam pitfalls

Collateral makes repayment certain.

Examine the promise and the collateral's priority and value.

Security can support collection without eliminating default risk.

Every nonnegotiable note is void.

Separate negotiability from ordinary contract enforceability.

Failure of one specialized classification does not erase all contractual rights.

A real estate license resolves securities compliance.

Examine the investment and required regulatory authority.

A promissory-note offering can raise separate securities obligations.

Connected concepts

Notes, security instruments, and defaultConnect repayment promises with the instruments securing them.Contract formation and enforceabilityApply ordinary contract requirements independently of negotiable-instrument status.

Knowledge check

1 / 13

An owner grants a valid, supported purchase option. The optionee has not exercised it, and its period remains open. What does the optionee presently hold?

Choose one answer

Sources

Reviewed 2026-09-06
  1. Civil Code section 1662, default risk of loss before and after title or possession
  2. Commercial Code section 1103, supplemental principles of law
  3. DRE real estate finance reference, notes and security instruments
  4. Commercial Code section 3106, unconditional payment and permitted source limitations
  5. CIV section 1638, clear contract language
  6. CIV section 1585, absolute and qualified acceptance
  7. CIV section 2985, real property sales contracts
  8. DRE contracts reference
  9. DRE landlord and tenant reference
  10. DRE real estate financing reference
  11. Commercial Code section 3112, fixed and variable interest
  12. Civil Code section 1624, real estate contract writing requirements
  13. Civil Code section 1925, hiring of real property
  14. Commercial Code section 3104, negotiable instruments
  15. DRE, 2026 Real Estate Law
  16. SEC Investor.gov, promissory notes and securities requirements